The Reformed Pastor Trashes NJ Supreme Court Verdict On Unborn
A few days ago in a posting on the topic of attitudes towards children, I noted a link to the story on
I laughed out loud when I read this. What does the disagreement over the “moral, theological, [and] ideological” status of such children have to do with “biological fact”? As far as it goes, I wonder why abortion proponents continue to argue about this. You can argue about the legal or philosophical definition of “person,” and whether a fetus fits that definition. But biologically there’s nothing else it could be but human.
The
And now I’ll state something even more obvious. These judges were appointed to ensure justice in American society. But how can justice even be considered for those whose very existence and identity are questioned, as the
This makes their verdict especially egregious and despicable.
Labels: what is the Unborn?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home